Faculty & Administration View All

Richard W. Garnett

Associate Dean and Professor of Law


Office Number: 3164 Eck Hall of Law
Telephone: 574.631.6981
Fax: 574.631.4197
Email: rgarnett@nd.edu
Staff Assistant: Sharon Loftus


Richard W. Garnett received his B.A. in philosophy summa cum laude from Duke University in 1990, and his J.D. from Yale Law School in 1995. He served as senior editor of the Yale Law Journal and as editor of the Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. After graduation, he clerked for Chief Judge Richard S. Arnold of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, and then for Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist. He practiced law for two years at the Washington, D.C., law firm of Miller, Cassidy, Larroca & Lewin, specializing in criminal-defense, religious-liberty, and education-reform matters. At Notre Dame, he teaches courses on criminal law, criminal procedure, First Amendment law, and the death penalty. His areas of research interest and expertise include:

- School choice
- Catholic Social Thought
- Church / State relations
- Religion in the public square
- Free speech and expressive association
- Free exercise of religion
- Federalism and criminal law
- Death Penalty


Blogs


In the News

LAW60307, Constitutional Law

LAW60302, Criminal Law

LAW70304, Freedom of Religion

LAW70306, The Death Penalty

LAW70307, Freedom of Speech/The First Amendment

LAW70359, Constitutional Criminal Procedure

LAW73836, Catholic Social Thought


Faculty Expertise Areas

  • Church / State relations
  • Constitutional law
  • Criminal law and procedure
  • Death penalty
  • Education reform and policy
  • Federalism and criminal law
  • Free speech and expressive association
  • Free exercise of religion
  • Law and religion
  • Religion in the public square
  • School choice

Works in Progress

TWO THERE ARE: UNDERSTANDING THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE (manuscript proposal).


Articles and Review Essays

Can There Really Be “Free Speech” in Public Schools?, 12 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 45-59 (2008).

Do Churches Matter? Towards an Institutional Understanding of the Religion Clauses, 53 VILLANOVA L. REV. 273-96 (2008).

Religion and Group Rights: Are Churches (Just) Like the Boy Scouts?, 22 ST. JOHN’S J. LEG. COMMENT. 515 (2007).

Pluralism, Dialogue, and Freedom: Professor Robert Rodes and the Church-State Nexus, 22 J. L. & RELIGION 503 (2007).

Church, State, and the Practice of Love, 52 VILLANOVA L. REV. 281 (2007).

Civic Unity and Religious Pluralism, 23 CONST. COMMENT. 241 (2006) (reviewing NOAH FELDMAN, DIVIDED BY GOD: AMERICA’S CHURCH-STATE PROBLEM—AND WHAT WE SHOULD DO ABOUT IT (2005) and KEVIN SEAMUS HASSON, THE RIGHT TO BE WRONG: ENDING THE CULTURE WAR OVER RELIGION IN AMERICA (2005)).

Taking Accommodation Seriously: Religious Freedom and the O Centro Case, 2006 CATO SUP. CT. REV. 257 (2006) (with Joshua D. Dunlap).

Religion, Division, and the First Amendment, 94 GEO. L.J. 1666 (2006).

The Freedom of the Church, 4 J. CATH. SOCIAL THOUGHT 59 (2006).

Changing Minds: Proselytism, Freedom, and the First Amendment, 2 UNIV. OF ST. THOMAS L. J. 453 (2005).

Jaycees Reconsidered: Judge Richard S. Arnold and the Freedom of Association, 58 ARKANSAS L. REV. 587 (2005).

Assimilation, Toleration, and the State’s Interest in Religious Doctrine, 51 U.C.L.A. L. REV. 1645 (2004).

American Conversations With(in) Catholicism, 102 MICH. L. REV. 1191 (2004)(reviewing JOHN T. MCGREEVY, CATHOLICISM AND AMERICAN FREEDOM: A HISTORY (2003)).

The Theology of the Blaine Amendments, 2 FIRST. AMD. L. REV. 45 (2003).

The New Federalism, the Spending Power, and Federal Criminal Law, 89 CORNELL L.REV. 1 (2003).

Christian Witness, Moral Anthropology, and the Death Penalty, 17 NOTRE DAME J. ETHICS, L. & PUB. POL’Y 541 (2003).

The Right Questions About Schoo1 Choice: Education, Religious Freedom, and the Common Good, 23 CARDOZO L. REV. 1281 (2002).

Sectarian Reflections on Lawyers’ Ethics and Death-Row Volunteers, 77 NOTRE DAME L.REV. 795 (2002).

Common Schools and the Common Good: Reflections on the School-Choice Debate, 75 ST. JOHN’S LAW REV. 219 (2001).

A Quiet Faith? Taxes, Politics, and the Privatization of Religion, 42 B.C. L. REV. 771 (2001).

The Story of Henry Adams’s Soul: Education and the Expression of Associations, 85 MINN. L. REV. 1841 (2001).

Brown’s Promise, Blaine’s Legacy, 17 CONST. COMM. 651 (2000) (reviewing JOSEPH P. VITERITTI, CHOOSING EQUALITY: SCHOOL CHOICE, THE CONSTITUTION, AND CIVIL SOCIETY (1999)).

Taking Pierce Seriously: The Family, Religious Education, and Harm to Children, 76 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 109 (2000).

Francis Bacon Takes On the Ghouls: The “First Principles” of Religious Freedom, 3 GREEN BAG 2D 447 (2000) (reviewing JOHN WITTE JR., RELIGION AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERIMENT (2000)).

School Choice, The First Amendment, and Social Justice, 4 TEX. REV. L. & POL. 301 (2000)(with Nicole Stelle Garnett).

Once More Into the Maze: United States v. Lopez, Tribal Self-Determination, and Federal Conspiracy Jurisdiction in Indian Country, 72 N.D. L. REV. 433 (1996).

Why Informed Consent? Human Experimentation and the Ethics of Autonomy, 36 CATH. LAW. 455 (1996).

Note, Depravity Thrice Removed: Using the “Heinous, Cruel, or Depraved” Factor to Aggravate Convictions of Nontriggermen Accomplices in Capital Cases, 103 YALE L. J. 2471 (1994).


Book Chapters

Less Is More: Justice Rehnquist, the Freedom of Speech, and Democracy, in C. BRADLEY, ED., THE REHNQUIST LEGACY (2006).

“Everlasting Splendours”: Death-Row Volunteers, Lawyers’ Ethics, and the Dignity of Creatures, in MICHAEL A. SCAPERLANDA & TERESA STANTON COLLETT, EDS., SELFEVIDENT TRUTHS: CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVES ON AMERICAN LAW (2007).

Regulatory Strings and Religious Freedom: Requiring Private Schools To Promote Public Values, in S. MACEDO, ET AL., EDS., EDUCATING CITIZENS: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON CIVIC VALUES AND SCHOOL CHOICE 324 (2004).

Christian Witness, Moral Anthropology, and the Death Penalty, in ERIK C. OWENS, ET AL., EDS., A CALL FOR RECKONING: RELIGION AND THE DEATH PENALTY 139 (2004).


Other Legal Publications

Drop “Coffers,” 10 GREEN BAG 2d 299 (2007) (with Benjamin P. Carr).

Free To Believe, FIRST THINGS (May 2007) (reviewing CHRISTOPHER L. EISGRUBER & LAWRENCE G. SAGER, RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND THE CONSTITUTION (2007)).

Individuals First, COMMONWEAL (April 6, 2007) (reviewing CHARLES FRIED, MODERN LIBERTY AND THE LIMITS OF GOVERNMENT (2006)).

Law, Lawyers, the Court, and Catholicism, American Catholic Studies Newsletter, Cushwa Center for the Study of American Catholicism, Vol. 33, No. 2 (Fall 2006).

Debate, Judicial Activism and its Critics, 155 U. PENN. L. REV. PENNUMBRA 112 (2006), http://www.pennumbra.com/debates/debate.php?did=3 (with Kermit Roosevelt).

Personal Reflections on the Chief, 10 TEX. REV. L. & POL. 283 (2006).

Chief Justice Rehnquist’s Enduring, Democratic Constitution,29 HARV. J. L. & PUB. POL’Y 395 (2006).

William H. Rehnquist: A Life Lived Greatly, and Well, 115 YALE L. J. 1847 (2006).

Introduction: Religion, Division, and the Constitution, 15 WM. & MARY BILL OF RIGHTS J. 1 (2006).

Chief Justice Rehnquist and the Freedom of Speech, ENGAGE (Vol. 7, Issue 1) (2006).

Bush v. Holmes: School Vouchers, Religious Freedom, and State Constitutions, 17 EDUC. & THE LAW 173 (2005) (with Christopher S. Pearsall).

Permanent Conflict, COMMONWEAL (Nov. 18, 2005) (reviewing NOAH FELDMAN, DIVIDED BY GOD (2005), MARCI A. HAMILTON, GOD VS. THE GAVEL (2005), and WINNIFRED FALLERS SULLIVAN, THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM (2005)).

Good News Club v. Milford Central School, in K. HALL, ED., THE OXFORD COMPANION TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES (2005).

Public Trial, in MATTHEW SPALDING & DAVID FORTE, EDS, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005).

Hail to the Chief?, LEGAL AFFAIRS (March 2005).

Citizens, Not Outlaws, NATIONAL REVIEW (Aug. 11, 2003) (reviewing MICHAEL J. PERRY, UNDER GOD? RELIGIOUS FAITH AND LIBERAL DEMOCRACY (2003)).

Final Justice, AMERICA (Oct. 27, 2003) (reviewing S. BANNER, THE DEATH PENALTY: AN AMERICAN HISTORY (2002) & F. ZIMRING, THE CONTRADICTIONS OF AMERICAN CAPITAL PUNISHMENT (2003)).

The Rehnquist Choice, TRIAL (June 2002) (reviewing JOHN DEAN, THE REHNQUIST CHOICE (2002)).

Section 666, The Spending Power, and the Federalization of Criminal Law: Salinas, Fischer, and the Way Ahead, THE CHAMPION (May 2001) (with John P. Elwood).

Education Reform at the Crossroads: Politics, The Constitution, and the Battle Over School Choice, 10 GEO. MASON CIV. R. L. J. 107 (2000).

What Are the Limits on Warrantless Drug Testing of Pregnant Women?, 1 A.B.A. PREVIEW 31 (September 13, 2000).

Does the Constitution Permit Federal Prosecution for the Arson of a Private Residence?, 6 A.B.A. PREVIEW 331 (March 8, 2000).

Are Payments to a Hospital for Services Provided Medicare Beneficiaries “Benefits” Under the Federal-Program Bribery Statute?, 5 A.B.A. PREVIEW 251 (February 5, 2000).

Tribute to the Honorable Richard S. Arnold, 1 J. APP. PRAC. & PROC. 204 (1999).

The Justice of School Choice, THE WEEKLY STANDARD (December 13, 1999) (reviewing JOSEPH P. VITERITTI, CHOOSING EQUALITY: SCHOOL CHOICE, THE CONSTITUTION, AND CIVIL SOCIETY (1999)).


Selected Commentary and Opinion Pieces

When Catholicism was the Target, USA TODAY (Jan. 28, 2008).

Our Real National Pastime, USA TODAY (Sept. 10, 2007).

Carhart, Casey, and the Court’s Catholics, JURIST (April 25, 2007).

China’s Lesson on Freedom of Religion, USA TODAY (March 26, 2007).

What Would Lincoln Do? A Test for the Roberts Court, THE WEEKLY STANDARD (Oct. 16, 2006) (with Michael Stokes Paulsen).

Don’t Use First Amendment To Erase Divisions, LOS ANGELES DAILY JOURNAL (October 9, 2006).

Downsizing and the Catholic Church, USA TODAY (July 16, 2006).

Campaigning from the Pulpit: Why Not, USA TODAY (April 16, 2006).

An Unassuming Decision, NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE (Feb. 23, 2006).

Two Justices Who “Get” Religion, USA TODAY (Jan. 23, 2006).

Religious Expression Should Be Welcomed, Indianapolis Star (July 17, 2005).

Unanimous!, National Review Online (June 1, 2005).

How High a Wall?, Commonweal (May 2005).

Debate Club, Legal Affairs (Feb. 2005). Hail to the Chief?

Law Schools and the Military, Commonweal (Jan. 2005).

Keep it to Yourself, Commonweal (Aug. 2004).

Crime Victims’ Rights Law Riddled With Pitfalls, Chicago Sun-Times (May 3, 2004).

Confine and Conquer: The California Supreme Court and Religious Freedom, National Review Online (March 3, 2004).

Let Off With a Warning, Legal Affairs (Jan./Feb. 2004).

Conservatives, Federalism, and Consistency, National Review Online (Dec. 1, 2003).

Yes to Vouchers, Commonweal (Aug. 16, 2002).

Future Church-State Battles Loom, The Wall Street Journal (July 1, 2002).

Choice Win: In the Spirit of Brown, National Review Online (June 27, 2002).

Different Views on School Choice, South Bend Tribune (Feb. 5, 2002).

Disrobed! Actually, They Think for Themselves, The Washington Post (July 1, 2001).

A Supreme Court Ruling Bodes Well for School Vouchers, The Wall Street Journal (June 13, 2001).

Misguided Voucher Verdict, The Washington Times (Dec. 14, 2000).

Lieberman Talks the Talk, The Los Angeles Times (Oct. 29, 2000).

Establishment Clause Housecleaning, National Review Online (June 28, 2000).

The Courts and Abortion, The Weekly Standard (June 12, 2000).

A Victory for the Family, The Wall Street Journal (June 6, 2000).

Free the States, or Free the People?, The Legal Times (April 10, 2000).

Why Kiryas Joel Matters, Jewish World Review (May 25, 1999).

After 200 Years, School Choice Loses in Maine, The Wall Street Journal (May 3, 1999).