Notre Dame Law Professors Offer Insight on Supreme Court Rulings

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court concluded its 2025–26 term with landmark decisions addressing birthright citizenship, mail-in voting, religious liberty, and presidential authority. Professors Richard Garnett, Derek Muller, Ashley Sanchez, and Haley Proctor shared their legal expertise with several national news outlets, offering analysis of the Court's most consequential rulings.

Richard Garnett
Professor Richard W. Garnett is a nationally recognized scholar of constitutional law whose work focuses on religious liberty and church–state relations. He, along with several other scholars, filed an amicus brief in Landor v. Louisiana Department of Corrections on behalf of the plaintiff. The Notre Dame Lindsay and Matt Moroun Religious Liberty Clinic filed a separate amicus brief for the plaintiff in this case. He was interviewed by several outlets about the case.
- ABC News: Supreme Court denies Rastafarian's lawsuit after he was forcibly shaved bald behind bars
- Bloomberg Law Podcast: Bloomberg Law: Rastafarian Can't Sue Over Violation of Religious Rights
- Gray Media: SCOTUS blocks lawsuit over forced head-shaving in prison
- Los Angeles Times: Inmates may not sue prison officials who violate their religious rights, Supreme Court rules

Derek Muller
Professor Derek Muller, a leading scholar and expert in election law, analyzed what this term's Supreme Court rulings mean for presidential authority and offered insight into the Court's decisions on mail-in voting and redistricting. See all of his interviews and quotes below.
- ABC News: Despite losses for Trump, Supreme Court enhanced presidential power: ANALYSIS
- Associated Press: Trump's fixation on voting has had mixed results. He still has ways to affect November's elections
- The Center Square: Analysts: Civil rights defined Supreme Court term
- NBC News: Supreme Court faces new criticism for redistricting decisions so close to the 2026 elections
- NPR: Supreme Court's Alabama redistricting decision could encourage more chaos, experts warn
- Reuters: US Supreme Court's uneven approach to election-map rulings boosts Republicans
- Roll Call: SCOTUS term marked by shifts to the right, some checks on Trump

Haley Proctor
Associate Professor Haley Proctor, a constitutional law scholar who also writes on Second Amendment issues, was interviewed about the court's decisions in Slaughter v. Trump and United States v. Hemani. See all of her interviews below.
- Bloomberg: Trump’s Firing Power Ripples Through US Agencies After Court Win
- CBS Evening News: What to know about the Supreme Court rulings on presidential firings
- Fox News: Gorsuch suggests Supreme Court's Trump ruling is opening move against administrative state
- The Hill (subscription required): Supreme Court’s narrow gun decision kindles divisions, more questions
- USA Today: Supreme Court justice wants to scrap 'failed' Second Amendment test
Ashley Sanchez
Associate Clinical Professor Ashley Sanchez is the director of Notre Dame Law School's Immigration Clinic. She provided insight into the Supreme Court's ruling allowing the Trump Administration to remove temporary protective status for certain immigrant groups. Read her interviews below.
- Reuters: On immigration, Supreme Court accedes to Trump's restrictive agenda
- USA Today: Supreme Court allows Trump to end deportation protections for immigrants