|Mark||Criniti||1100 Eck Hall of Law||Mark.F.Criniti.firstname.lastname@example.org|| || ||https://law.nd.edu/assets/188933/original/mark_criniti.jpg||Adjunct Professor||MCRINIT1|
|Mark||McKenna||3120 Eck Hall of Lawemail@example.com||http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=347075||/assets/271473/fullsize/mark_mckenna_cv_april_2018_.pdf|
- Copyright Law
- Design Patent
- Intellectual Property Law
|Mark P. McKenna teaches and writes in the areas of intellectual property and privacy law. Professor McKenna is widely recognized as a leading intellectual property scholar, having published in many of the most prestigious journals in his field. Though his core area of expertise is trademark law, he has written broadly on nearly every area of intellectual property, including utility patent, design patent, copyright, and the right of publicity. His most recent work has focused on the intersection of intellectual property rights regimes and the intersection of IP rights with adjacent rights.
Professor McKenna joined the Notre Dame Law School faculty on a permanent basis in the Fall of 2008 after visiting for a semester in the Spring of 2008. He has also been a visiting professor at Stanford Law School, the University of Toronto Faculty of Law, the Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, and the Turin University-WIPO Master of Laws in Intellectual Property Program.
Prior to joining the Notre Dame faculty, Professor McKenna was a member of the faculty at Saint Louis University School of Law and practiced law with an intellectual property firm in Chicago, where he primarily litigated trademark and copyright cases. He graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 1997 with a degree in Economics and earned his J.D. from the University of Virginia School of Law in 2000.
In addition to various intellectual property courses, Professor McKenna teaches Information Privacy Law and the first-year Torts class, and has previously taught Civil Procedure.|| ||/assets/181942/300x/mckenna_mark_2_1_.jpg||LAW60901, Torts
LAW70134, Intellectual Property Survey
LAW70128, Copyright Law
LAW70136, Design Law
LAW70137, Trademarks & Unfair Competition
LAW73132, Information Privacy Law||Books
THE LAW OF DESIGN: DESIGN PATENT, TRADEMARK, & COPYRIGHT (West 2017) (with Edward Lee and David L. Schwartz)
THE LAW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Aspen Law & Business, Fifth Edition 2017) (with Craig Nard & Michael Madison)
THE LAW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Aspen Law & Business, Fourth Edition (2013) (with Craig Nard & Michael Madison)
THE LAW OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (Aspen Law & Business, Third Edition 2011) (with Craig Nard, Michael Madison, and David Barnes)
Law Review Articles
Claiming Design, 167 University of Pennsylvania Law Review __ (forthcoming 2018) (with Jeanne Fromer)
What’s In, and What’s Out: How IP’s Boundary Rules Shape Innovation, 30
HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW & TECHNOLOGY 491 (2017) (with Christopher Sprigman)
Scope, 57 WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW 2197 (2016) (with Mark A. Lemley)
Confusion Isn’t Everything, 89 Notre Dame LAW REVIEW 253 (2013) (with William McGeveran).
• Selected as one of the best law review articles on intellectual property law published in 2013; republished in the INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW REVIEW (West 2014)
Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke? Market Definition in Antitrust and IP, 100 GEORGETOWN LAW JOURNAL 2055 (2012) (with Mark A. Lemley) (100th Anniversary Volume).
Reviewed on Jotwell at http://ip.jotwell.com/marks-on-markets-and-competition/
A Consumer Decision-Making Model of Trademark Law, 97 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 67 (2012).
Owning Mark(et)s, 109 MICHIGAN LAW REVIEW 137 (2010) (with Mark A. Lemley).
Reviewed on Jotwell at http://ip.jotwell.com/marks-on-marks/
Irrelevant Confusion, 62 STANFORD LAW REVIEW 413 (2010) (with Mark A. Lemley).
Testing Modern Trademark Law's Theory of Harm, 95 IOWA LAW REVIEW 63 (2009).
Selected as one of the best law review articles on intellectual property law published in 2009 and republished in the INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW REVIEW (West 2010)
Trademark Use and the Problem of Source, 2009 UNIVERSARY OF ILLINOIS LAW REVIEW 773 (2009).
Reviewed on Jotwell at http://ip.jotwell.com/trademark-use-on-the-loose/
The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law, 82 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 1839 (2007).
Reprinted at 97 TRADEMARK REPORTER 1126 (2007)
Winner of 2007 Ladas Memorial Award for writing excellence on the subject of trademarks and related matters (International Trademark Association)
The Right of Publicity and Autonomous Self-Definition, 67 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LAW REVIEW 225 (2005).
Book Chapters and Symposium Contributions
The Case Against Product Configuration Trade Dress, in TRADEMARK LAW AND THEORY: REFORM OF TRADEMARK LAW, Graeme Dinwoodie & Mark Janis, eds. (forthcoming 2018)
Trademarks and Digital Goods: A Comparative Perspective, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, Tanya Aplin, ed. (forthcoming 2018) (with Lucas Osborn)
Criminal Trademark Law and the Problem of Inevitable Creep, _ AKRON LAW REVIEW _ (forthcoming 2018) (Oldham Lecture)
Remarks on the Problem of Scope in IP, _ Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts _ (forthcoming 2018) (keynote talk, The Art & Science of the IP Deal, University of Washington School of Law)
Knowing Separability When We See It, 166 UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA LAW REVIEW ONLINE 131 (2017) (invited contribution to symposium on Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands)
Trademarks and Digital Goods, 92 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 1425 (2017) (with Lucas Osborn) (contribution to symposium on Negotiating IP’s Boundaries in an Evolving World)
* Selected as one of the best law review articles on intellectual property law published in 2017 and republished in the Intellectual Property Law Review (West, forthcoming 2018)
2016 Trademark Year in Review, 92 Notre Dame Law Review Online (2017) (with Shelby Niemann)
Is Pepsi Really a Substitute for Coke? Market Definition in Antitrust and IP, in THE CAMBRIDGE HANDBOOK OF ANTITRUST, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, AND HIGH TECH, Roger D. Blair and D. Daniel Sokol, eds. (Cambridge University Press 2017) (invited contribution)
What’s Wrong with Copying? Nothing: Review of Abraham Drassinower, What’s Wrong with Copying, 29.1 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY JOURNAL 27 (2016)
Systems of Human and Intellectual Capital, 93 Tex. LAW REVIEW See Also 231 (2015) (with Brett M. Frischmann) (Response to Orly Lobel, The New Cognitive Property: Human Capital Law and the Reach of Intellectual Property, 93 TEX. L. REV. 789 (2015).
Progress and Competition in Design, 17 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW REVIEW _ (forthcoming 2014) (with Katherine J. Strandburg) (contribution to Stanford Law School symposium on Design Patents in the Modern World)
How to Fix Copyright in Three Impossible Steps: Review of WILLIAM PATRY, HOW TO FIX COPYRIGHT, 39 JOURNAL OF COLLEGE & UNIVERSITY LAW 715 (2013)
Trademark Law’s Faux Federalism, in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND THE COMMON LAW, Shyamkrishna Balganesh, ed. (Cambridge University Press 2013) (invited contribution to University of Pennsylvania Law School symposium on Intellectual Property and the Common Law)
Dastar’s Next Stand, 19 JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW _ (forthcoming 2012) (invited contribution to The Future of Intellectual Property Law symposium)
(Dys)functionality, 48 HOUSTON LAW REVIEW (forthcoming 2012) (invited contribution to University of Houston Law Center Institute for Intellectual Property & Information Law Santa Fe Conference, Trademark: Today and Tomorrow)
Introduction: Creativity and the Law, 86 NOTRE DAME LAW REVIEW 1819 (2011) (introduction for symposium on Creativity and the Law) (http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/86ndlr5/McKenna.pdf)
Probabilistic Knowledge of Third-Party Trademark Infringement, 2011 STANFORD TECHNOLOGY LAW JOURNAL _ (forthcoming) (invited contribution to symposium on Secondary and Intermediary Liability on the Internet)
Intergenerational Progress, 2011 WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW 123 (with Brett Frischmann) (invited contribution to Wisconsin Law Review symposium on Intergenerational Equity and Intellectual Property)
Back to the Future: Rediscovering Equitable Discretion in Trademark Cases, 14 LEWIS & CLARK L. REV. 537 (2010) (invited contribution to Business Law Forum on Intellection Property Remedies)
An Alternate Approach to Channeling?, 51 WILLIAM & MARY LAW REVIEW 873 (2009) (invited contribution to conference on The Boundaries of Intellectual Property);
Teaching Trademark Theory Through the Lens of Distinctiveness, 52 ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 843 (2008) (contribution to annual teaching edition)
What's the Frequency Kenneth? Channeling Doctrines in Trademark Law, in INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND INFORMATION WEALTH (Peter Yu, ed., Praeger Press 2007)
Intellectual Property, Privatization and Democracy: A Response to Professor Rose, 50 ST. LOUIS UNIVERSITY LAW JOURNAL 829 (2006) (invited contribution to Childress Lecture program)
The Rehnquist Court and the Groundwork for Greater First Amendment Scrutiny of Intellectual Property, WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF LAW & POLICY 11 (2006) (invited contribution to conference on The Rehnquist Court and the First Amendment)
The Rehnquist Court and the Groundwork for Greater First Amendment Scrutiny of Intellectual Property, 21 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF LAW & POLICY 11 (2006) (invited contribution to conference on The Rehnquist Court and the First Amendment) (http://ssrn.com/abstract=957420)
Investigating Design (with Jessica Silbey)
Mapping Confusion (with Rebecca Tushnet)
Unfair Disruption (with Mark A. Lemley)
Toward a Theory of Inventorship in Patent Law (with Michael J. Burstein)
Comparative Analysis of Failures and Institutions in Context (with Brett Frischmann) (for the Yale Law School symposium on Innovation Law Beyond IP)
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE ON BEHALF OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PROFESSORS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT AND IN SUPPORT OF REVERSAL, American Society for Testing and Materials v. Public.Resource.Org, Inc. (D.C. Cir. 2017) (with Rebecca Tushnet) https://tushnet.files.wordpress.com/2017/09/astm-tm-as-filed.pdf
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS IN FAVOR OF JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, ZeniMax Media Inc. v. Oculus VR, LLC (Northern District of Texas 2017) (with Rebecca Tushnet) https://tushnet.files.wordpress.com/2016/07/15-866-tsac-intellectual-property-professors.pdf
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS, Tobinick v. Novella (11th Cir. 2016) (https://tushnet.files.wordpress.com/2016/05/amicus-intobinick-v-novella-with-motion.pdf)
(Rebecca Tushnet, Lead Author)
Lead Author, BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES, Phoenix Entertainment Partners v. Dannette Rumsey and Basket Case Pub (7th Cir. 2015)
Brief of Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Defendant-Appellee National Football League, Dryer v. National Football League (8th Cir. 2015)
(https://tushnet.files.wordpress.com/2015/03/dryer-post-proof-rt-march-17.pdf) (with Rebecca Tushnet)
Lead Author, BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW PROFESSORS IN SUPPORT OF APPELLEES CANTON PHOENIX, INC. AND BING PAN ZHU, Slep-Tone Entertainment Corp. v. Canton Phoenix Inc. (9th Cir. 2015)
Lead Author, Brief of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors in Support of Appellant Lubecore International, Inc. and Reversal, Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. Lubecore International, Inc. (6th Cir. 2012)
Lead Author, Brief of Amici Curiae Intellectual Property Law Professors in Support of Appellant, Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. New Life Art, et al. (11th Circuit 2010)( http://www.newlifeart.com/images/amicusbrief2.pdf)
Other Professional Writings
Registering Disagreement: Registration in Modern American Trademark
Law, 130 Harv. L. Rev. 867 (2017)
Trademark Year in Review
Designing Architectural Copyright, JOTWELL (November 4, 2015) (reviewing Kevin
E. Collins, Economically Defeasible Rights to Facilitate Information Disclosure: The
Hidden Wisdom of Pre-AWCPA Copyright)(http://ip.jotwell.com/designingarchitectural-copyright/)
Measuring Serendipity, JOTWELL (January 20, 2015) (reviewing Bhaven N.
Sampat, Serendipity) (http://ip.jotwell.com/measuring-serendipity/)
The Limits of the Supreme Court’s Technological Analogies, Slate (June 26, 2014)
The Implications of Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc., Guest Post on PatentlyO Blog
(June 19, 2014) (http://patentlyo.com/patent/2014/06/implications-blackhorse-football.html
Super-Sizing IP Values, Reviewing MADHAVI SUNDER, FROM GOODS TO A GOOD LIFE, Concurring Opinions blog (September 12, 2012)
Don’t Stop at SOPA. SOPA and PIPA are (almost) dead. Now can we talk about the law that already exists? Slate (January 20, 2012)||John P. Murphy Foundation Professor of LawNotre Dame Presidential Fellow||LuAnn Nate||MMCKENN6|
|Mark||Telloyan||Pfirstname.lastname@example.org|| ||Mark P. Telloyan joined the faculty of Notre Dame Law School in the spring of 2017 as an adjunct instructor in bankruptcy. He is currently a partner at the law firm of O'Brien & Telloyan in South Bend, providing both debtor and creditor representation. Prior to private practice, Telloyan served three years as a deputy prosecutor for St. Joseph County, Indiana.
Telloyan received his J.D. from Notre Dame Law School in 1998, where he was a member of the Journal of College & University Law. Upon graduation, he clerked for Judge Sanford Brook in the St. Joseph Superior Court, South Bend. In 1999, he was awarded a U.S. Teaching Fellowship at Law and spent a year on the faculty at National University of Ireland, Galway.
Before law school, Telloyan taught English at his alma mater, Pillsbury Baptist Bible College. He also taught overseas at Chengdu University of Science and Technology (China) and Matsue South High School (Japan). His advanced degrees are from Seattle Pacific University (M.Ed.) and Minnesota State University, Mankato (M.A.).
Telloyan is a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and president of the St. Joseph County Debtors' Bar. In 2015, he was elected to the St. Joseph County Council, representing the cities of Lakeville, North Liberty, Walkerton, and New Carlisle. His daughter, Lauren Maxson, is a 2016 graduate of Notre Dame Law School.|| |
|Mary Ellen||O'Connell||3104 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.7953||574.631.4197||MaryEllenOConnell@nd.edu||https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Ellen_O%27Connell||http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=375701||http://www.nd.edu/~ndlaw/faculty/cv/oconnell_cv.pdf|
- Armed Conflict
- Art Law
- International Courts
- International Dispute Resolution
- International Law
|Mary Ellen O'Connell is the Robert and Marion Short Professor of Law and is Research Professor of International Dispute Resolution—Kroc Institute, University of Notre Dame.
O’Connell’s research is in the areas of international law on the use of force and international legal theory. She is the author or editor of numerous books and articles on these subjects, including, The Prohibition of the Use of Force, in RESEARCH HANDBOOK ON INTERNATIONAL CONFLICT AND SECURITY LAW, JUS AD BELLUM, JUS IN BELLO AND JUS POST BELLUM (N. D. White and C. Henderson eds., Edward Elgar 2013); Peace and War, in The HANDBOOK OF THE HISTORY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, (B. Fassbender and A. Peters, eds. Oxford, 2012); Unlawful Killing with Combat Drones, A Case Study of Pakistan 2004-2009, in SHOOTING TO KILL: SOCIO-LEGAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE USE OF LETHAL FORCE (Simon Bronitt, et al. eds., Hart Publishing, 2012); Cyber Security Without Cyber War, 17 J. CONFLICT & SECURITY LAW, 187 (2012); WHAT IS WAR? AN INVESTIGATION IN THE WAKE OF 9/11 (Martinus Nijhof/Brill, 2012); and THE POWER AND PURPOSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, INSIGHTS FROM THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ENFORCEMENT (Oxford 2008, paperback 2011).
O’Connell has been named a Senior Law Fellow at the Center for Theological Inquiry in Princeton for the 2014-2015 academic year. O’Connell was a vice president of the American Society of International Law from 2010-2012; she chaired the Use of Force Committee of the International Law Association from 2005 to 2010. Before joining the faculty at Notre Dame, she was a faculty member at The Ohio State University, the Johns Hopkins University Nitze School of Advanced International Studies Bologna Center, and Indiana University. From 1995 to 1998, she was a professional military educator for the U.S. Department of Defense in Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany. Prior to joining the academy, she practiced law with the Washington, D.C.-based international law firm, Covington & Burling.
O’Connell earned her BA in history at Northwestern with highest honors. She won a Marshall Scholarship for graduate study in the UK, where she earned an MSc in international relations at the LSE and an LLB with first class honors, Cambridge University. She holds a JD from Columbia Law School where she won Columbia’s Berger Prize for International Law. In July 2013, O’Connell received the PhD under special regulation from Cambridge University.|| ||/assets/71673/original/oconnell.jpg||LAW70401, International Law
LAW70431, International Environmental Law
LAW73402, Protection of Cultural Heritage: War, Markets and Museums
LAW73428, International Law and the Use of Force
LAW75718, International Dispute Resolution|| Recent Publication
WHAT IS WAR? AN INVESTIGATION IN THE WAKE OF 9/11 (Martinus Nijhof/Brill, edited volume, 2012)
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION, CASES AND MATERIALS (Carolina, 2d ed. 2012)
THE POWER AND PURPOSE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, INSIGHTS FROM THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ENFORCEMENT (Oxford University Press, paperback, 2011)(hardback published, 2008; reviewed in the AM. J. INT’L L., EUR. J. INT’L L., HUMAN RTS Q., ILSA J. and other journals and on-lines sites)
THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM, CASES AND MATERIALS (with N. Roht-Ariaza and R. Scott, Foundation, fully revised and updated 6th ed. 2010)
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE, CASES AND MATERIALS (Foundation, 2d ed. 2009)
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE “GLOBAL WAR ON TERRORISM”, LECTURES FOR THE UNIVERSITY OF PARIS II (Assas-Pantheon) (Editions-Pedone 2007)
REDEFINING SOVEREIGNTY, THE USE OF FORCE AFTER THE COLD WAR (edited volume with M. Bothe and N. Ronzitti eds., Transnational, 2005)
INTERNATIONAL DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, LIBRARY OF ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (Ashgate/Dartmouth, edited volume, 2003)
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2002 ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (with R. Alford, ed. ASIL)
POLITICS, VALUES AND FUNCTIONS: INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE 21ST CENTURY, ESSAYS IN HONOR OF PROF. LOUIS HENKIN (with J. Charney and D. Anton, eds., Kluwer Law International 1997)
INTERNATIONAL LAW AND THE USE OF FORCE (with T. Ehrlich, Little, Brown & Co., 1993)
Articles and Book Chapters
Cyber Security without Cyber War, 17 J. CONFLICT & SECURITY L. 187-209 (2012).
What is Aggression?: Comparing the Jus ad Bellum and the ICC Statute (with M. Niyazmatov) 10 J. INT’L CRIM. J. 189 (2012)
Jus Cogens, International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms, in THE ROLE OF ETHICS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW (Donald Earl Childress III ed. Cambridge, 2011)(an earlier version of the article was published in JORNADAS DE DERECHO INTERNACIONAL (2010).
Seductive Drones: Learning from a Decade of Lethal Operations, J. LAW, INFO. & SCI. (special issue; DOI: 10.5778/JLIS.2011.21.Oconnell.1)
The Natural Superiority of Courts, FROM BILATERALISM TO COMMUNITY INTEREST: ESSAYS IN HONOUR OF JUDGE BRUNO SIMMA (Oxford Univ. Press., 2011).
The Choice of Law Against Terrorism, 4 J. NAT’L SEC. L. & POL’Y 343 (2010).
Responsibility to Peace: A Critique of R2P, 4 J. INTERVENTION AND STATEBUILDING 39 (Mar. 2010) republished in CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON THE RESPONSIBILITY TO PROTECT: INTERROGATING THEORY AND PRACTICE (Philip Cunliffe ed. Routledge, 2011).
NATO at Sixty: America Between Law and War, 17 Ind. J. Global L. Studies 187 (2010).
Responses to Ten Questions, 36 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 5127 (2010) (special ed., J. of the Natâl Security Forum) (responding to ten questions posed by the editors of the special edition).
Arbitration and the Avoidance of War: The 19th Century American Vision in THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONAL COURTS AND TRIBUNALS 30 (Cesare Romano ed., Cambridge, 2009)
Combatants and the Combat Zone, 43 University Of Richmond Law Review 845 (2009).
Beyond Wealth: Stories of Art, War, and Greed, 59 ALA. L. REV. 1075 (2008)
Preserving the Peace: The Continuing Ban on War Between States, 38 CAL. WESTERN L. REV. 41 (2008)
Die Forderung nach humanitären Interventionen – eine kritische Betrachtung, im DAS RECHT UND DIE MACHT. BEITRÄGE ZUM VÖLKERRECHT UND VÖLKERSTRAFRECHT AM BEGINN DES 21. JAHRHUNDERTS (Gerd Hankel ed., 2008) (The Claims for Humanitarian Intervention, A Critical Observation in Law and Power, in CONTRIBUTIONS TO INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW AT THE BEGINNING OF THE 21ST CENTURY)
Rethinking the Remedy of Return in International Art Law (with M. Alevras-Chen), in THE ACQUISITION AND EXHIBITION OF CLASSICAL ANTIQUITIES, PROFESSIONAL, LEGAL AND ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES 114 (Robin F. Rodes ed. 2008)
The Nicaragua Case: Preserving World Peace and the World Court, in International Law Stories 339-70 (John E. Noyes et al. eds., 2007).
The Ban on the Bomb - and Bombing: Iran, the U.S., and the International Law of Self-Defense, 57 Syracuse L. Rev. 497 (2007) (with Maria Alveras-Chen).
The Counter-Reformation of the Security Council, 2 J. INT’L L. & RELATIONS 107 (2005).
Crying War, in INTERNATIONAL LAW AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS: BRIDGING THEORY AND PRACTICE (Tom Biersteker et al, eds. Routledge 2007).
The United Nations Security Council and the Authorization of Force: Renewing the Council Through Law Reform, in THE SECURITY COUNCIL AND THE USE OF FORCE, THEORY AND REALITY--A NEED FOR CHANGE? 47 (Niels Blokker & Nico Schrijver eds., Martinus Nijhof, 2005).
Affirming the Ban on Coercive Interrogation, 66 OHIO STATE L. J. (2005).
Taking Opinio Juris Seriously, A Classical Approach to International Law on the Use of Force, in INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMARY LAW ON THE USE OF FORCE: A METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 9 (E. Cannizzaro and P. Palchetti eds. 2005).
Enhancing the Status of Non-State Actors Through a Global War on Terror, 43 COL. J. TRANS. LAW 435 (2005)
Who Helps the Hegemon? 8 AUSTRIAN REV. INT’L & EUR. L. 91 (2003)
Controlling Countermeasures, in INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TODAY: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF OSCAR SCHACHTER 49 (M. Ragazzi ed., 2005)
Occupation Failures and the Legality of Armed Conflict: The Case of Iraqi Cultural Property, 9 J. ART & ANTIQUITY LAW 323 (2004)
La Doctrine Américaine et L’intervention en Iraq (The Iraq War in American Legal Scholarship) 2003 ANNUAIRE FRANÇAISE 3
The Legal Case Against the Global War on Terrorism, 36 CASE W. RES. J. INT’L L. 349 (2004)
Lawful and Unlawful Wars Against Terrorism in THE WAR ON INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM 79 (Ved Nanda ed., Transnational, 2005)
Ad Hoc War, in KRISENSICHERUNG UND HUMANITÄRER SCHUTZ—CRISIS MANAGEMENT AND HUMANITARIAN PROTECTION 399 (Horst Fischer et al, eds., 2004)
Re-Leashing the Dogs of War, Review Essay of Christine Gray, International Law and the Use of Force (2000) 97 AM. J. INT’L L 446 (2003)
To Kill or Capture Suspects in the Global War on Terror, 35 CASE W. RES. J. INT’L L. 325 (2003)
Enforcing International Law in National Courts: The German and American Experiences Compared in KONFLIKT DER RECHTSKULTUREN? DIE USA UND DEUTSCHLAND IM VERGLEICH/AMERICAN AND GERMAN LEGAL CULTURES, CONTRAST, CONFLICT, CONVERGENCE? (2003)
Lawful Self-Defense to Terrorism, 63 U. OF PITTSBURGH L.R. 889 (2002)(excerpted in MARK JANIS & JOHN NOYES, INTERNATIONAL LAW (3d ed. 2006) and HAROLD BRUFF & PETER SHANE, SEPARATION OF POWERS LAW (2d ed. 2005))
American Exceptionalism and the International Law of Self-Defense, 31 DENVER J. INT’L L. & POL’Y 43 (2002)
Pre-emption and Exception, The US Moves Beyond Unilateralism, 20 SICHERHEIT & FRIEDEN 136 (2002)(reprinted in DIE STÄRKE DES RECHTS GEGEN DAS RECHT DES STÄRKEREN (THE MIGHT OF LAW VERSUS THE LAW OF THE MIGHTY)(2003))
The Myth of Preemptive Self-Defense, Aug. 6, 2002, available at http://www.asil.org/taskforce/oconnell.pdf (excerpted in JENNIFER ABASSI AND ANTHONY D’AMATO, INTERNATIONAL LAW TODAY, West 2006)
Evidence of Terror, 7 J. OF CONFLICT AND SECURITY LAW 19 (2002)
Debating the Law of Sanctions, 13 EUR. J. INT’L L. 63 (2002)
Humanitarian Assistance in Non-International Armed Conflict, The Fourth Wave of Rights, Duties and Remedies, 31 ISRAEL YBK. ON HUMAN RIGHTS 183 (2001)
The UN, NATO and International Law After Kosovo, 22 HUM. RTS. Q. (February 2000) (excerpted in INTERNATIONAL LAW (B. Carter et al., eds. 2003))
The Role of Soft Law in a Global Order in Commitment and Compliance, in THE ROLE OF NON-BINDING NORMS IN THE INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SYSTEM (Dinah Shelton ed., 2000)
New International Legal Process, 93 AM. J. INT’L L. 334 (1999) (reprinted in THE METHODS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (S. Ratner & A-M Slaughter eds., 2004); excerpted in OONAH K. HATHAWAY AND HAROLD HONGJU KOH, THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND POLITICS (2004))
The Application of International Law to the New Security Agenda, The Johns Hopkins University Bologna Center, Occasional Paper No. 2 (October 1997)
Regulating the Use of Force in the 21st Century: The Continuing Importance of State Autonomy, 36 COL. J. TRANS. L. 473 (1997)
Why Do States Take on International Environmental Law Obligations?: A Comparison of the United States and The Netherlands in ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES AND THE EUROPEAN UNION (Randall Baker, ed. 1997)
Environment and Security Concerns for Europe, Europa Institut, No. 352, University of Saarland (1996)
International Legal Issues of the Dayton Accords: Arresting the Indicted and Preventing Partition, in A CLOSE-UP VIEW OF EUROPEAN SECURITY, Institute for Strategic and Defence Studies, Budapest (1996)
Enforcement and the Success of International Environmental Law, 3 IND. J. GLOBAL L. Stud. 47(1995)(excerpted in INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY (D. Hunter et al., eds. 2002, 1998)
The Failure to Observe Provisional Measures of Protection in the Case of Bosnia v. Yugoslavia, Walther-Schücking-Kolleg, No. 15, Institut für Internationales Recht an der Universität Kiel (1994)
Using Trade to Enforce International Environmental Law, 1 IND. J. GLOBAL L. STUD. 273 (1994)
Enforcing the New International Law of the Environment, 35 GERMAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 293 (1992)
International Legal Aid: The Secretary General's Trust Fund to Assist States in the Settlement of Disputes Through the International Court of Justice, in INTERNATIONAL COURTS IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY (Mark Janis ed., 1992)
Continuing Limits on UN Intervention in Civil War, 67 IND. L. J. 903 (1992)
Enforcing the Prohibition on the Use of Force: The U.N.'s Response to Iraq's Invasion of Kuwait, 5 SO. ILL. L.R. 453 (1991)
The Prospects for Enforcing Monetary Judgments of the International Court of Justice: A Study of Nicaragua's Judgment Against the United States, 30 VA. J. INT'L L. 891 (1990)
The United States Experience at the International Court of Justice (with D'Amato) in THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE AT A CROSSROADS (L.F. Damrosch ed., 1987)
Soviet Prisoners in the Afghan Conflict, 23 COL. J. TRANS. L. 483 (1985)
Selected Shorter Publications, Online Publications and Conference Proceedings since 2007:
When are Drone Killings Illegal? Aug. 16, 2012, CNN OPINION.
Affirming the Ban on Bombing Iran, March 2012, Syracuse University College of Law,
The Right of Self-Defense, Oxford Bibliographies Online, March 2012
The Principle of Necessity and the Libya Intervention, Panel: Revolution & Intervention in the Middle East, PROC. 105TH AM. SOC. INT’L L. (2012)
The International Law of Drones, ASIL INSIGHTS, Nov. 12, 2010.
Ten Questions, 5 J. NAT’L SEC. FORUM 5113 (2010)
Toward a New Paradigm: Notre Dame’s Institute of Advanced Studies, in The Idea of a Catholic Institute for Advanced Study (Vittorio Hösle and Donald L. Stelluto, eds., 2010)
FLYING BLIND, 202 America (March 15, 2010)
NATO AT SIXTY, AMERICA BETWEEN LAW AND WAr, 17 IN. J. GLOB. LEGAL STUD. 187 (2010)
Saving Lives Through a Definition of International Armed Conflict, Panel: Categories of Armed Conflicts: Notions and Interpretations, Armed Conflicts and Parties to Armed Conflicts under IHL: Confronting Legal Categories to Contemporary Realities, 10th Bruges Colloquium 19, 22-23 October 2009
No Excuses, Our Obligation to Prosecute Human Rights Violations, 201 AMERICA 11 (August 3-10, 2009)
International Law’s Natural Normativity, Panel: Visions of International Law: Insights from Normative Theory, 103 PROC. AM. SOC. INT’L L. 385 (Mar. 25-28, 2009)
Review of Thomas Weiss, Humanitarian Intervention: Ideas in Action (2007) 7 PERSPECTIVES ON POLITICS 712 (No. 3 2009)
President Obama: New Hope for International Law? JURIST, Jan. 26, 2009
Defining Armed Conflict, 13 J. CONFLICT & SECURITY L. 393 (Winter 2008).
Old Hawks Wrong for Foreign Policy, CHICAGO TRIBUNE, Dec. 2, 2008,
The Way Forward: Post 9/11 Principles, JURIST, Nov. 25 2008,
International Legal Process, MAX PLANCK ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW (R. Wolfrum et al. eds., 2008)
Learning from the Iraq War: The Wisdom of International Law, JURIST, March 19, 2008, http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/forumy/2008/03/learning-from-iraq-war-wisdom-of.php||Why Obama, when moving to punish Syria, is unlikely to go it alone (+video) - Christian Science Monitor (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), August 26, 2013
- McClatchy Washington Bureau (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), August 26, 2013
Attack Needs U.N. Approval to Be Legal (Opinion by Mary Ellen O’Connell) New York Times - August 26, 2013
Drones, Guantanamo part of broad Obama counterterrorism speech - CBS News (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), May 23, 2013
Law School’s O’Connell to testify before Congress on citizens’ rights during 'War on Terror' ND News, May 22, 2013
CIA Terror War Torture And Rendition Program: An Italian Spy Is Sentenced To Jail - Can Tenet, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Ashcroft Be Next? - International Business Times (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), February 22, 2013
Mary Ellen O'Connell was quoted by several news media sources on using drones - February 7, 2013
- Wired - How Obama Transformed an Old Military Concept So He Can Drone Americans
- NBCNews.com - 'Judge, jury and executioner': Legal experts fear implications of White House drone memo
- New York Times - A Contradiction in Terms
- NBC - 4 key questions about controversial Justice Department drone memo
- Guest on KQED Radio - Using Drones to Target Americans
- Op-ed in New York Times - The Questions Brennan Can't Dodge
How Obama Transformed an Old Military Concept So He Can Drone Americans - Wired - (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), February 5, 2013
Brennan must answer for drones, torture (Opinion by Mary Ellen O’Connell) CNN.com – January 14, 2013
Palestinian 'state' vote a crisis moment - Asian Times (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), November 29, 2012
Drone technology raises questions on evolving nature of war and its conduct - National Catholic Reporter (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), November 5, 2012
US faces more activism against America's drone policy in Pakistan - The Voice of Russia (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), October 22, 2012
In legal battle against drone strikes, she's on the front lines – LA Times – (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), October 9, 2012
The Democrats and the Liberal Catholic Voter - NYTimes.com New York Times - (By: Mary Ellen O’Connell), September 19, 2012
Does Libya intervention violate War Powers Resolution? – St. Petersburg Times – (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), June 24, 2011
Debate: Did Obama Overstep His Authority In Libya? – NPR (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), June 23, 2011
U.S. strains credibility on its Libya role (Opinion by Mary Ellen O’Connell) CNN.com – June 21, 2011
Drone warfare won’t win in Libya (Opinion by Mary Ellen O’Connell) CNN.com – April 25, 2011
US Works With Sudan on Gitmo – Wall Street Journal (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), August 12, 2010
Hentoff: Is Obama ‘in Love With Drones’? – (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), July 31, 2010
Few batting eyes at Obama’s deadly drone policy – The Trentonian (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), July 28, 2010
Obama’s in love with drones – WorldNetDaily (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), July 27, 2010
Do drone attacks comply with international law? – PolitiFact (Quotes: Mary Ellen O’Connell), July 1st, 2010
Legal questions raised over CIA drone strikes – Associated Press, April 29, 2010 (Quoting Mary Ellen O’Connell)
House subcommittee hearing questions legality of drone attacks – CNN.com, April 28, 2010 (Quoting Mary Ellen O’Connell)
Respect the Battlefield – The U.S. Has No More Legal Authority Today to Kill Persons in Yemen than it Had in 2002 (by: Mary Ellen O’Connell) – CBS News Opinion, April 9, 2010
International legal experts question legality of US drone strikes – Malaysia Sun, April 7, 2010 (Quoting Mary Ellen O’Connell)
U.S. Defends Legality of Killing With Drones – The Wall Street Journal, April 4, 2010 (Quoting Mary Ellen O’Connell)
NPR interviews Prof. O’Connell on drone strikes – National Public Radio, March 26, 2010||Robert & Marion Short Professor of LawResearch Professor of International Dispute Resolution||Tracy Zielke||MOCONNE7|
|Mary ||Squyres ||email@example.com|| ||Mary Squyres is a Shareholder of Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione and serves as its Chairman of International Trademark Group. Squyres manages eight staff and more than 20,000 active trademark files. Her practice includes international trademark litigation, licensing and prosecution, including determination of international filing strategies, negotiating worldwide mutual co-existence agreements and effective enforcement strategies to defend marks and prevent infringements. She joined Brinks Hofer Gilson & Lione in 1991. Squyers served as Special Assistant to Corporate General Counsel at Sears, Roebuck and Co. She is a Visiting Professor of The Community Trade Mark and the Madrid Protocol at Cooley Law School, Adjunct Professor of Legal Writing for Intellectual Property Practice at The John Marshall Law School, Visiting Professor of The Community Trade Mark and the Madrid Protocol at McGill University. She is a Member of International Trademark Association (INTA), MARQUES, European Community Trade Mark Association (ECTA) and The National Registry of Who's Who. Ms. Squyres holds LL.M. in Intellectual Property from The John Marshall Law School in 1994, J.D. from Valparaiso University School of Law in 1982, M.A. in American History from The University of Chicago in 1972 and B.A. from Manhattan ville College in 1971.|| ||https://law.nd.edu/assets/187843/original/mary.jpg||Adjunct Professor|
|Matthew||Barrett||J.||3106 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.8121||574.631.8078||Matthew.J.Barrett.firstname.lastname@example.org||http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=479671||http://www.nd.edu/~ndlaw/faculty/cv/barrett_cv.pdf|
- Financial Accounting
- Financial Frauds
- Law & Accounting
- Loan Repayment Assistance Programs
|Matthew J. Barrett, a member of the Notre Dame Law School faculty since 1990, teaches business-related courses, currently accounting for lawyers, analytical methods for lawyers, and federal income taxation. He has also taught business associations, business planning, not-for-profit organizations, and seminars studying the intersection between law and accounting. His seminars during the fall semesters in 2008 and 2009 focused on the stock option scandals and the credit crisis, respectively. In 2001, the graduating class selected him as the Law School’s Distinguished Teacher. In 2010, he was appointed as an adjunct professor at New York University School of Law to teach a course in Financial Accounting for Lawyers for the NYU/IRS Continuing Professional Education Program sponsored by the Office of Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service.
Barrett earned both his B.B.A. and his J.D. summa cum laude from Notre Dame in 1982 and 1985, respectively, graduating at the top of his law-school class. A member of the Ohio bar since 1985, he clerked for the Honorable Cornelia G. Kennedy at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1985-86), and worked as an associate in the tax group at the Columbus, Ohio, law firm of Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease (1986-90).
Barrett became a Certified Public Accountant in Ohio in 1987. The Ohio Society of Certified Public Accountants awarded him its Silver Medal for the second-highest score on the May 1982 Ohio CPA examination, and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants awarded him its Elijah Watt Sells certificate for performance with high distinction on the May 1982 Uniform CPA examination.
In 1997, Barrett joined David R. Herwitz, now Professor Emeritus at Harvard Law School, as co-author of the second edition of the law school casebook, Accounting for Lawyers, a text whose roots date back to the first casebook on accounting for law students in 1948. More recently, Barrett co-authored unabridged and concise versions of the fifth edition in 2015. Foundation Press published combined supplements for those fourth editions in 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012. To date, these texts have been adopted for classroom use at more than 100 different law schools, including seventy that have used a fourth edition.
Barrett actively participates in the life of the Law School, the University, and the local South Bend community. In 1998, the Student Bar Association awarded him the Captain William O. McLean Community Spirit Award for exceptional contributions to community life. In 2010, Barrett and his wife received The Spirit of Holy Cross Award from the Priests and Brothers of the Congregation of Holy Cross, Indiana Province for “years of diligent and deft service as [lay collaborators] with the Congregation of Holy Cross.” That same year, he also received the Grenville Clark Award from the University of Notre Dame for volunteer activities advancing the cause of peace and human rights.
Within the Law School, he currently serves on the Loan Forgiveness Committee (2008 to present). He has previously led the Ad Hoc Committee on the Honor Code (2010-2011), Promotions Committee (2007-2008), and the Loan Forgiveness Committee (2001-2004); served on the Appointments Committee (1999-2001, 2002, and 2004-2006), the Building Committee (2001-2009), the Curriculum Committee (1994-1998 and 2001-2004), the Promotions Committee (2006-2008), and the Public Interest Committee (1997-1999); and volunteered as faculty advisor to the Business Law Forum (1998-2003).
Barrett has served as a member of the Accountancy Advisory Board in the Mendoza College of Business since 1994 and on the Niebuhr and Clark Awards Committee since 2010. He previously served a term on the University Committee on Appeals (2009-2012), two terms as the Law School’s elected representative to the University’s Faculty Board on Athletics (1998-2004), serving as chair of the subcommittee on student welfare (2001-2004), a member of the subcommittee on communications (2000-2001), and a member of the University’s Ad Hoc Committee on Drug Testing of Student-Athletes (2001-2003). Barrett also served on the Committee on Student Life and the Subcommittee on Student Activities for the Colloquy for the Year 2000 (1991-92) and the Niebuhr and Clark Awards Committee (1997-2002).
Outside the University, Barrett has served as chair (1999-2000) and member (1997-2000) of the Committee on Audit and Association Investment Policy for the Association of American Law Schools, on the editorial board of the Journal of Limited Liability Companies (1994-1998), and as recording secretary of the taxation committee of the Ohio State Bar Association (1989-1990). He is a member of the ABA Section on Business Law, Committee on Law and Accounting (since 1995) and was elected as an alumnus member of Phi Beta Kappa in 2002.
Barrett periodically assists the Notre Dame Clinical Law Center with tax issues, volunteers with the Tax Assistance Program in the Mendoza College of Business, and has advised the South Bend Center for the Homeless on various tax and corporate matters.
He is a parishioner of St. Joseph Church in South Bend, where he serves as a hospitality minister and a member of the St. Vincent de Paul Society. He served as an elected member of the Parish Pastoral Council from 1999-2002 and on the Strategic Planning Steering Committee from 1999-2005. He has also served a member of the board of directors of the St. Vincent de Paul Society of St. Joseph County, Inc.
He is married to Kate Barrett, who works part-time for Campus Ministry as the assistant director of undergraduate ministry. They have three sons and one daughter.|| ||/assets/71514/original/barrettm.jpg||LAW70100, Accounting for Lawyers
LAW70605, Federal Income Taxation
LAW70124, Business Basics for Attorneys||Books
Materials on Accounting for Lawyers (5th ed. Foundation Press 2015 (both unabridged and concise versions); Supp. 2008, 2009 2010, 2011, 2013 (combined) (with David R. Herwitz) (cited by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Bolt v. Merrimack Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 503 F.3d 913, 915–17 (9th Cir. 2007) (adopted for classroom use at seventy law schools, including Yale, Harvard, Chicago, NYU, Michigan, University of California (Berkeley), Cornell, Georgetown, USC, Washington University (St. Louis), George Washington, and University of California (Davis)).
Materials on Accounting for Lawyers (3d ed. Foundation Press 2001 & Supp. 2004, 2005) (both unabridged and concise versions) (with David R. Herwitz) (adopted for classroom use at more than sixty-five law schools, including Harvard, Michigan, University of California (Berkeley), Cornell, Georgetown, USC, Washington University (St. Louis), George Washington, Minnesota, and Boston University).
Materials on Accounting for Lawyers (2d ed. Foundation Press 1997 & Supp. 1999, 2000) (with David R. Herwitz) (cited by the Supreme Court of the United States in its unanimous opinion in Mutual Insurance Co. v. Commissioner, 523 U.S. 382, 384 (1998), and adopted for classroom use at more than fifty law schools, including Harvard, NYU, University of California (Berkeley), Georgetown, and USC).
Enron and Andersen - What Went Wrong and Why Similar Audit Failures Could Happen Again in Enron Corporate Fiascos and Their Implications 155-168 (Nancy B. Rapoport & Bala G. Dharan eds., Foundation Press 2004).
Professor Barrett has published numerous articles in his areas of academic expertise, including:
Sarbanes-Oxley, Kermit the Frog, and Competition Regarding Audit Quality, 3 Journal of Business & Technology Law 207 (2008).
The SEC and Accounting, in Part Through the Eyes of Pacioli, 80 Notre Dame Law Review 837-92 (2005).
Tax Services as a Trojan Horse in the Auditor Independence Provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley, 2004 Michigan State Law Review 463-504 (2004).
Practicing What We Teach: A Call For Progressive Church Taxes, America 18-20 (March 29, 2004).
The Theological Case for Progressive Taxation as Applied to Diocesan Taxes or Assessments Under Canon Law in the United States, The Jurist 63 (2003) 312-65.
New Opportunities for Obtaining and Using Litigation Reserves and Disclosures, 64 Ohio St. L.J. 1183 (2003).
Opportunities for Obtaining and Using Litigation Reserves and Disclosures, 63 Ohio St. L.J. 1017-1106 (2002).
Enron, Accounting, and Lawyers, Notre Dame Lawyer, Summer 2002, at 14â20 (reprinted on pages 193 to 201 of a Program Handbook entitled "Analyzing Financial Statements After Enron What Every Lawyer Should Know" (January 2003)).
Agency Authority in LLC Statues (Part II): Hypothetical Situations and Practical Suggestions, with Brian H. Blaney, 5 The Journal of Limited Liability Companies 11 (1998).
Agency Authority in LLC Statues (Part I): Uniformity and Peculiarity, with Brian H. Blaney, 4 The Journal of Limited Liability Companies 139 (1998).
Determining an Individualâs Federal Income Tax Liability When the Tax Benefit Rule Applies: A Fifty-Year Checkup Brings a New Prescription for Calculating Gross, Adjusted Gross and Taxable Incomes, 1994 Brigham Young University Law Review 1 (1994), reprinted in 63 Tax Notes 899 (1994).
Reducing Liability Risks of Members in a Multistate Limited Liability Company, 1 The Journal of Limited Liability Companies 57 (1994).
Contort: Tortious Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Noninsurance, Commercial Contracts - Its Existence and Desirability, 60 Notre Dame Law Review 510 (1985).||Featured Faculty on NDLS Home Page: Matthew J. Barrett – August 24, 2009||Professor of Law||Alicia Cummins||mbarret2|
|Matthew||Hall||E.K.||411 Decioemail@example.com|| || || || ||Concurrent Assistant Professor|
|Matthew||Wirig||1100 Eck Hall of Lawfirstname.lastname@example.org|| ||Matthew Wirig is a partner at Chapman and Cutler, LLP in Chicago. He has extensive experience in corporate and securities law matters with particular emphasis on representing clients involved in the investment management industry. He is also an active member of Chapman and Cutler’s Practice Innovations team working on the development and implementation of a range of technology-enabled legal solutions for clients including document automation applications, document management systems, and automated compliance and contract management programs.
He writes extensively on regulatory developments impacting investment companies, investment advisers, broker-dealers, and municipal securities dealers. His teaching and research interests are focused on modern transactional legal practice, the investment management industry, innovation and the use of technology in legal practice, and the role of technology in access to justice. He has an active pro bono practice through the ABA's Free Legal Answers program, administered in Illinois by Illinois Legal Aid Online. He also serves on the board of directors for Illinois Legal Aid Online, an organization that sits at the center of the legal aid system in Illinois and uses technology to simplify our complex legal system and connect people to the best help that is available to them.
He earned his B.S. in finance with highest honors from the University of Illinois in 2003 and his J.D. from Notre Dame Law School cum laude in 2006.|| ||/assets/244150/300x/matthewwirig.jpg||Transactional Practice||Adjunct Professor||MWIRIG|
|Matt||Knecht||1188D Eck Hall||574.631.5766|| || |
- Library Information Technology
|Michael||Addoemail@example.com|| ||Michael K. Addo became director of the London Global Gateway Law Program on July 1.
Addo came to Notre Dame from the University of Exeter as an international law and human rights specialist with more than 25 years of experience in research, teaching, and policy advice.
Addo also had management and administrative responsibilities at Exeter as associate dean of the faculty of postgraduate studies – a position that involved the development and negotiation of policy strategies, the coordination of teaching standards, the accreditation of programs across the university, and overseeing the examination and award of doctoral degrees.
His work outside the university has included holding several leadership positions with the United Nations. The UN Human Rights Council appointed him in 2011 to join its Working Group on Business and Human Rights, a body he currently chairs. He has also served as chairperson of the Co-ordination Committee of United Nations Special Procedure Mandate Holders from 2015 to 2016.
Originally from Ghana, Addo earned a bachelor of laws degree with honours at the University of Ghana and a graduate diploma in legal practice at Ghana Law School. He holds a diploma in international human rights law from the International Institute of Human Rights at the University of Strasbourg, France, and obtained master of law and doctoral degrees at the University of Essex in England.|| ||/assets/259294/fullsize/addo_michael.jpg||Director, London Global Gateway Law Program||maddo|