|John||Tuskey||1100 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.6627|| || ||Adjunct Professor||JTUSKEY|
|Joseph||Bauer||P.||2115 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.6514||574.631.8078||Joseph.P.Bauer.email@example.com||/assets/185012/fullsize/bauer_resume_revised_sept_2015.doc|
- Tenure and Tenure-track Faculty
- Civil Procedure
- Conflict of Laws
- Copyright Law
- Federal Courts & Federal Litigation
- Intellectual Property Law
|Joseph P. Bauer, an expert in the field of antitrust, joined the Notre Dame Law School faculty in 1973 as an assistant professor, becoming an associate professor in 1977 and a full professor in 1980. He teaches the required first-year course in civil procedure, and also teaches antitrust, copyright and trademarks, and conflict of laws. During his tenure, he has served the Law School in numerous ways, including as co-director of the London Law Programme (1975-76, 1989-90), as associate dean (1985-88, 1991, 1996), as elected representative to the Provost’s Advisory Committee (1993-99), as elected vice chair of the Law School’s Appointments Committee for more than 10 years, and as elected vice chair of the Law School’s Promotions Committee on several occasions. He earned his B.A. from the University of Pennsylvania in 1965 and his J.D. from the Harvard Law School in 1969.
A member of the New York bar since 1970, he worked as an associate at the New York City law firm of Kaye, Scholer, Fierman, Hays & Handler (1969-72), and served as an instructor at the University of Michigan (1972-73). During the spring and summer of 2002, he was on leave, working in an Of Counsel Status at Kirkland & Ellis in Washington, D.C. He has also held a visiting professorship at Emory Law School (spring, 2004) and at the University of North Carolina (1981-82). He has also taught at a number of foreign law schools, including Hong Kong University, University College London, and the University of Innsbruck (Austria).
Since 1985, Professor Bauer, with the late Earl W. Kintner until his death some years ago, has prepared the annual updates to a seminal work in antitrust law, Kintner and Bauer, Federal Antitrust Law, volumes I-XI. In 2013, he published, with Professor William Page of the University of Florida College of Law and John Lopatka of Penn State Law School as his co-authors, the second revised edition of Volume II of this series, which concentrates on sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act. This is the sixth volume in this series written by Professor Bauer. Professor Bauer has also served as a consultant to the Federal Trade Commission’s Bureau of Competition (1977-78), and has served on the AALS Antitrust Section Executive Committee (member 1984-89, chair 1987-89). He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American Antitrust Institute. He has testified on numerous occasions before Senate and House committees and subcommittees and in judicial proceedings, and he has served as an expert or consultant for a number of antitrust and intellectual property matters.|| ||/assets/181650/300x/bauer_2015.jpg||LAW60308, Civil Procedure
LAW70117, Antitrust Law
LAW70131, Copyright and Trademark
LAW70371, Conflict of Laws||Books
Federal Antitrust Law, with E. W. Kintner, William H. Page & John E. Lopatka (LexisNexis, Supps 1-11, 2014).
2 Federal Antitrust Law, with William H. Page & John E. Lopatka (Lexis-Nexis, 3d ed. 2013).
2 Federal Antitrust Law: Practices Prohibited by the Sherman Act, with Wm. Page (rev. 2d ed.) (Anderson Publishing Co. 2002).
11 Federal Antitrust Law: Relief, Defenses, Prior Adjudication, and Statutes of Limitations (Anderson Publishing Co. 1998).
10 Federal Antitrust Law: State Action Doctrine, Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, Miscellaneous Exemptions, with E.W. Kintner (Anderson Publishing Co. 1994).
9 Federal Antitrust Law: Antitrust Exemptions, with E.W. Kintner (Anderson Publishing Co. 1989).
3 Federal Antitrust Law: The Robinson-Patman Act, with E.W. Kintner (Anderson Publishing Co. 1983).
The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: Further Limitations on the Ability of the Antitrust Regime to Promote Customer Welfare Chapter 8 in Competition and the State, pp 134-148 (Stanford Univ. Press, pub.) (2014).
Supplements to Volumes I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, IX, X and XI of Federal Antitrust Law, with E.W. Kintner (Lexis NexisPublishing Co. 2015), prepared and updated annually since 1985.
Professor Bauer has published numerous articles on antitrust, civil procedure, intellectual property law, and conflicts of laws including:
The Foreign Trade Antitrust Improvements Act: Do We Really Want to Return to American Banana?, 65 Maine L. Rev. 4-26 (2012).
Shedding Light on Shady Grove: Further Reflections on the Erie Doctrine From a Conflicts Perspective, 86 Notre Dame Law Review 939-985 (2011).
Copyright and the First Amendment: Comrades, Combatants, or Uneasy Allies?, 67 Washington & Lee Law Review 831-914 (2010).
Addressing the Incoherency of the Preemption Provision of the Copyright Act of 1976, 10 Vanderbilt J. of Entertainment and Technology Law 1 (2007).
Antitrust Implications of Aftermarkets, 52 Antitrust Bulletin 31 (2007).
Refusals to Deal with Competitors by Owners Of Patents and Copyrights: Reflections on the Image Technical and Xerox Decisions, 55 DePaul Law Review 1211-46 (2006).
Reflections on the Manifold Means of Enforcing the Antitrust Laws: Too Much, Too Little, or Just Right? 16 Loyola Consumer Law Review 303 (2004).
The Stealth Assault on Antitrust Enforcement: Raising the Barriers for Antittrust Injury and Standing, 62 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 437 (2001).
The Erie Doctrine Revisited: How a Conflicts Perspective Can Aid the Analysis, 74 Notre Dame Law Review 1235 (1999).
Antitrust and Sports: Must Competition on the Field Displace Competition in the Market?, 60 Tennessee Law Review 263 (1993).
Schiavone: An Un-Fortune-ate Illustration of the Supreme Court's Role as Interpreter of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 63 Notre Dame Law Review 720 (1988).
Application of the Antitrust Laws to the Activities of Insurance Companies: Heavier Risks, Expanded Coverage, and Greater Liability, of the Antitrust Laws 63 North Carolina Law Review 431 (1985).
Antitrust Exemptions for Private Requests for Governmental Action: A Critical Analysis of the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine, 17 UC-Davis Law Review 549 (1984).
A Federal Law of Unfair Competition: What Should Be the Reach of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act?, 31 UCLA Law Review 671 (1984).
Government Enforcement Policy of Section 7 of the Clayton Act: Carte Blanche for Conglomerate Mergers?, 71 California Law Review 348 (1983).
A Simplified Approach to Tying Arrangements: A Legal and Economic Analysis, 33 Vanderbilt Law Review 283 (1980).
Per Se Illegality of Concerted Refusals to Deal: A Rule Ripe for Reexamination, 79 Columbia Law Review 685 (1979).
Challenging Conglomerate Mergers Under Section 7 of the Clayton Act: Today’s Law and Tomorrow’s Legislation, 58 Boston Univ. Law Review 199 (1978).
Professional Activities and the Antitrust Laws, 50 Notre Dame Lawyer 570 (1975).
(also oral argument before the U.S. Supreme Court)
Brief for Respondent, Northwest Wholesale Stationers v. Pacific Stationery & Printing Co., 472 U.S. 284 (1984).
Brief and Reply Brief for Petitioner, Lee v. United States, 432 U.S. 23 (1977).||Reynolds American-Lorillard merger could face antitrust hurdles - (Quotes: Joseph Bauer) - CBS Money Watch, July 16, 2014
NCAA: O’Bannon case a possible bellwether for big changes in college sports - (Quotes: Joseph Bauer) - The Salt Lake Tribune, July 1, 2014
Apple ordered to change 'most favored' e-book contracts - (Quotes: Joseph Bauer) - Washington Post, September 6, 2013
Apple's E-Book Story Still Largely Unwrit - (Quotes: Joseph Bauer) - MacNewsWorld, July 12, 2013
San Jose's Lawsuit Against Major League Baseball Is Weak - (Quotes: Joseph Bauer) - Forbes, June 20, 2013
Professor Bauer was quoted by the Associated Press on Pa. governor sues NCAA over Penn State sanctions in the following sources on January 1, 2013:
Huffington Post, Yahoo! News, CBS, ABC, Fox, Businessweek, NPR, US News and World Report
Professor Bauer was also quoted on the ATT&T, T-Mobile merger in the following sources on August 31, 2011:
Government Sues To Block AT&T, T-Mobile Merger, Washington Post, NPR, Forbes, ABC, and many other media sources.
AT&T Gearing Up for Rare Antitrust Fight With DOJ, New York Times, CBS, BusinessWeek, and over 100 other media sources.||Professor of Law||Beth Ferrettie||JBAUER|
|Judge Kathleen||Lang||1100 Eck Hall of Lawfirstname.lastname@example.org|| || ||Intensive Trial Ad||Adjunct Professor||klang4|
|Judith||Fox||1111 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.7795||574.631.6725||Judith.L.Fox.email@example.com||http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=381930||https://law.nd.edu/assets/187628/fox_cv_2016.pdf|
- Consumer Law
- Cross-Cultural Counseling
- Fair Debt Collection
- Predatory Lending
|Judith Fox is a Clinical Professor of Law at the Notre Dame Law School, where she teaches and practices consumer law. Since joining the Notre Dame faculty 1997, she has taught courses in consumer law, alternative dispute resolution, ethics and domestic violence. Prior to joining the law school faculty, Judy was the deputy director of Berrien County Legal Services in St. Joseph, Michigan. Judy graduated from Notre Dame Law School, magna cum laude in 1993. She was the articles editor of the Notre Dame Law Review. Prior to attending law school, Judy was a loan officer at banks in both Pennsylvania and Indiana.
Ms. Fox runs the Economic Justice Clinic. Her advocacy and research focus on issues of predatory lending, primarily in the housing market. She is on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Consumer Advisory Board and the Advisory Board of the Indiana Foreclosure Legal Assistance Program, the predatory lending committee of the Bridges Out of Poverty Initiative and the National Association of Consumer Lawyers.|| ||/assets/71747/original/fox.jpg||LAW75721, Economic Justice Project I
LAW75723, Economic Justice Project II
LAW75717, Alternative Dispute Resolution
LAW70319, Consumer Law||Articles
The Future of Foreclosure Law in the Wake of the Great Housing Crisis of 2007-2014, 54 Washburn Law Journal (forthcoming, 2015)
Rush to Judgment: How the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Fails to Protect Consumers in Judicial Collection, Vol. 13 Florida Business Law Rev. (2014)
The Foreclosure Echo: How Abandoned Foreclosures are re-entering the market through Debt Buyers, 26 Loy. Consumer Law Rev 25, 2013
Consumer Law Clinics: Community-Based Lawyering—A social Justice Response to the Financial Crisis, 20 Geo. J. Pov. L. & Pol’y 517-529 (2013)
How Forum Determines Substance in Judicial Debt Collection, 31 Banking and Financial Services Rev. 11, August 2012
Do We Have a Debt Collection Crisis? Some Cautionary Tales of Debt Collection in Indiana, 24 Loy. Consumer Law Rev. 355 (2012)||What makes medical debt detrimental, Marketplace (Quotes Judy Fox) January 12, 2015
Shazam! Now You Look Like A Better Borrower, NPR (Quotes Judy Fox) August 8, 2014
Why Credit Scores May Be About to Go Up: It’s the New You, Bloomberg (Quotes Judy Fox) August 8, 2014
US Mortgage Collectors Gag Homeowners in Loan Deals, Reuters, May 21, 2014 (Quotes Judy Fox)
Rise of the Zombie House, Indiana Lawyer, April 23, 2014 (Quotes Judy Fox)
What Are 'Zombie' Properties And How Can We Prevent Them? HuffingtonPost Live (Quotes Judy Fox) April 3, 2013
Zombie foreclosures: Borrowers hit with debts that won't die - CNN Money (Quotes Judy Fox) February 22, 2013
When Living in Limbo Avoids Living on the Street – New York Times (Quotes Judy Fox) March 3, 2012
Homeowners may gain ground in foreclosures – MSNBC (Quotes Judy Fox) October 8, 2010
Imprisoned for debt in America – World Socialist Web Site (Quotes Judy Fox) July 16, 2010
Facing foreclosure? Don’t pack just yet – MSN, Sept. 23, 2009 (Judith Fox, Notre Dame Law School)
Banks Starting to Walk Away on Foreclosures – New York Times, March 29, 2009 (Quotes Judy Fox, associate professional specialist, Legal Aid Clinic)||Clinical Professor of Law||jfox|
|Julian||Velasco||2142 Eck Hall of Lawfirstname.lastname@example.org||http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=118680||http://www.nd.edu/~ndlaw/faculty/cv/velasco_cv.pdf|
- Tenure and Tenure-track Faculty
- Corporate Governance
- Corporate Law
- Fiduciary Law
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Securities Regulation
|Julian Velasco joined the faculty in the fall of 2001 as an associate professor of law, and earned tenure in 2007. Prior to joining the Notre Dame Law School faculty, he served as an associate professor at the Hofstra University School of Law, practiced law as a corporate attorney with Sullivan & Cromwell, a New York City law firm, and served as a law clerk to the Honorable Ellsworth A. Van Graafeiland, United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. He is admitted to practice in the state of New York.
Professor Velasco received his J.D. from Columbia University School of Law, where he was awarded the honors of Kent Scholar and Stone Scholar and served as an editor of the Columbia Law Review. He earned a B.S. magna cum laude from Georgetown University School of Business Administration, where he majored in Finance and minored in Philosophy and in Theology.
Professor Velasco’s primary teaching and research interests include corporate law, corporate governance, and fiduciary law.|| ||/assets/85768/original/velasco_11_12.jpg||LAW70101, Business Associations
LAW70107, Securities Regulation
LAW70123, Corporate Finance
LAW70127, Mergers and Acquisitions
LAW73125, Advanced Topics in Corporate Law (Seminar)||Selected Scholarship
A Defense of the Corporate Law Duty of Care, 40 J. CORP. L. 647 (2015).
Fiduciary Duties and Fiduciary Outs, 21 GEO. MASON L. REV. 157 (2013).
The Role of Aspiration in Corporate Fiduciary Duties, 54 WM. & MARY L. REV. 519 (2012).
How Many Fiduciary Duties Are There in Corporate Law?, 83 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1231 (2010).
Shareholder Ownership and Primacy, 2010 U. Ill. L. Rev. 897 (2010).
Taking Shareholder Rights Seriously, 41 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 605 (2007).
The Fundamental Rights of the Shareholder, 40 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 407 (2006).
Structural Bias and the Need for Substantive Review, 82 Wash. U.L.Q. 821 (2004), reprinted in 47 Corp. Prac. Commentator 679 (2005).
Just Do It: An Antidote to the Poison Pill, 52 Emory L.J. 849 (2003).
The Enduring Illegitimacy of the Poison Pill, 27 J. Corp. L. 381 (2002).
Congressional Control Over Federal Court Jurisdiction: A Defense of the Traditional View, 46 Cath. U. L. Rev. 671 (1997).
Note, The Copyrightability of Nonliteral Elements of Computer Programs, 94 Colum. L. Rev. 242 (1994), reprinted in 27 Intell. Prop. L. Rev. 329 (1995).||Associate Professor of Law||Gloria Krull||JVELASCO|
|Julie||Douglas||2189 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.1884||Julie.B.Douglas.email@example.com|| || ||Adjunct Assistant Professor||Debbie Sumption||jdougla3|
|Julie||Shook||2100 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.0276||Julie.A.Shook.firstname.lastname@example.org|| || ||Dean’s Administrative Assistant for:
Dean Nell Jessup Newton||Dean’s Administrative Assistant|| |
|Justice Carol A.||Corrigan|| ||During the week of August 15, 2015, California Supreme Court Associate Justice Carol A. Corrigan will serve as the Judge James J. Clynes, Jr. Visiting Chair in the Ethics of Litigation Within the Judicial Process. Justice Corrigan will teach in the Intensive Trial Advocacy program.
Justice Corrigan has a long career in public service and on the bench. After earning her degrees from Holy Names College and Hastings College of Law, she began work as a district attorney in Alameda County (1975-1987) and then proceeded to serve as a judge in the Oakland Emeryville Piedmont Judicial District (1987-1991), Judge of Alameda County Superior Court (1991-1994), and Associate Justice of the California First Appellate District, Division Three (1994-2006). She was appointed Associate Justice of the California Supreme Court on January 4, 2006.
Justice Corrigan has served on the California Judicial Council, the Judicial Council Task Force on Jury Instructions, the Commission on the Future of California's Courts, the President's Commission on Organized Crime, and as a Special Consultant to the President's Task Force on Victims of Violent Crime. In addition to past stints as an adjunct professor at several California law schools, she serves on the faculty of the California Judicial College and the Continuing Judicial Studies Program. Justice Corrigan has earned numerous awards and honors, including the 2004 Saint Thomas More Award, 2003 California Judicial Council Jurist of the Year, and 1997 National Institute of Trial Advocacy Robert E. Keeton Distinguished Faculty Award. This year, she and Justice Mark Simons will be given the Judicial Counsel's inaugural Excellence in Judicial Education Award. She has been named by the Chief Justice to chair the Blue Ribbon Commission on the Future of California's Courts.
Justice Corrigan graduated magna cum laude from Holy Names College in 1970 and earned her Juris Doctor from the University of California, Hastings College of Law in 1975. She has also taught courses at several law schools, including U.C. Berkeley’s Boalt Hall School of Law and U.C. Hastings College of Law.
Fall 2012, Justice Corrigan served as the Judge James J. Clynes, Jr. Visiting Chair in the Ethics of Litigation Within the Judicial Process. Justice Corrigan taught Appellate Advocacy Training, served as a guest lecturer for a Criminal Law course, and made a presentation to the Women’s Legal Forum. In 2011, she was a member of the Court of the 61st Annual Moot Court Showcase Argument.|| ||/assets/172253/fullsize/corrigan.jpg||LAW 75710, Trial Advocacy Intensive||Judge James A. Clydes Distinguished Adjunct Professor|
|Justice||David||Steven||1100 Eck Hall of Law|| || || || ||Adjunct Faculty||Rebecca Ward|| |
|Justice Mbuyiseli||Madlanga||1100 Eck Hall of Law||574.631.6166|| ||Justice Mbuyiseli Madlangais is a judge of the Constitutional Court of South Africa. From 1987 to 1989 he worked as a law lecturer at the University of Transkei, teaching customary law, the law of delict and the law of contract. He won a scholarship to attend the University of Notre Dame and completed his LLM in 1990. After graduating he worked in the Washington, D.C. office of Amnesty International.
In 1991, Madlanga returned to South Africa and began practice as an advocate in Mthatha. In 1996, he was appointed to the bench of the Transkei Division of the High Court (now the Mthatha seat of the Eastern Cape Division) and later became its acting Judge President.
From 1998 to 1999, he was an acting judge on the Supreme Court of Appeal. The following year he became an acting judge of the Constitutional Court upon Arthur Chaskalson's invitation. In 2001, Madlanga resigned from the bench, and returned to private practice. In 2013, Madlanga was appointed permanently to the Constitutional Court.|| ||Adjunct Professor|